Bidirectional multi-qubit quantum teleportation in noisy channel aided with weak measurement
Yang Guang, Lian Bao-Wang, Nie Min, Jin Jiao
Department of Communication Engineering, School of Electronics and Information, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: sharon.yg@163.com

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61172071), the Scientific Research Program Funded by Shaanxi Provincial Education Department, China (Grant No. 16JK1711), the International Scientific Cooperation Program of Shaanxi Province, China (Grant No. 2015KW-013), and the Natural Science Foundation Research Project of Shaanxi Province, China (Grant No. 2016JQ6033).

Abstract

Recently, bidirectional quantum teleportation has attracted a great deal of research attention. However, existing bidirectional teleportation schemes are normally discussed on the basis of perfect quantum environments. In this paper, we first put forward a bidirectional teleportation scheme to transport three-qubit Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger (GHZ) states based on controled-not (CNOT) operation and single-qubit measurement. Then, we generalize it to the teleportation of multi-qubit GHZ states. Further, we discuss the influence of quantum noise on our scheme by the example of an amplitude damping channel, then we obtain the fidelity of the teleportation. Finally, we utilize the weak measurement and the corresponding reversing measurement to protect the quantum entanglement, which shows an effective enhancement of the teleportation fidelity.

1. Introduction

Quantum teleportation (QT) plays an important role in quantum computing and quantum communication, which utilizes pre-shared quantum entanglement and classical communication to transmit an unknown quantum state from one location to another. Since the first QT protocol was introduced by Bennnet et al. in 1993,[1] it has become a research hotspot. Many modified QT schemes have been proposed, such as controlled teleportation,[25] probabilistic teleportation,[69] and bidirectional quantum teleportation (BQT).[1013]

Having the capability of transmitting quantum information between Alice and Bob in two directions simultaneously, BQT has drawn more and more attention in recent years. Huelga et al. discussed the possibility of using BQT to implement the nonlocal quantum gates.[10,11] In 2013, Zha et al. proposed a controlled BQT scheme by using a five-qubit cluster state to transmit arbitrary single-qubit states.[12] Other similar BQT protocols have been presented, by using different types of entanglement states as the teleportation channels, such as five-qubit composite GHZ–Bell state,[13] six-qubit cluster state,[14] and genuine five-qubit entangled state.[15] After that, asymmetric controlled BQT schemes were devised to transmit a single-qubit state and a two-qubit entanglement state.[1618] Binayak and Arpan proposed a BQT protocol to transmit arbitrary two-qubit entanglement states via a ten-qubit entangled state.[19] Hassanpour and Houshmand presented a BQT scheme to transmit pure EPR states by using a composite GHZ state.[20]

However, current research work relating to the above BQT seldom thinks about the problem of quantum noise. In a practical situation, a quantum state will couple with the environment inevitably, which breaks the coherence of the quantum entanglement state and gives rise to quantum noise. This does occur during the entanglement distribution in BQT. So, it is very important to analyze the influence of the quantum noise in the process of BQT, thus to determine whether a BQT is successful in a certain circumstance.

On the other hand, to overcome the influence of decoherence on quantum entanglement, several methods have been proposed, including quantum entanglement purification,[2123] quantum error coding,[2426] and decoherence-free subspace.[2729] In recent years, weak measurement and its reversing measurement were widely studied to protect quantum state and quantum entanglement. Korotkov and Jordan demonstrated that the weak measurement of a solid-state qubit could be recovered with a reversal procedure.[30] The similar recovery methods of a superconducting phase qubit and an arbitrary cavity field with finite photon number were discussed and demonstrated in Refs. [31] and [32]. Liao et al. proposed an alternative way based on a Hadamard gate and CNOT gate to recover an arbitrary pure two-qubit entanglement state that has undergone a weak measurement.[33] Korotkov and Keane,[34] Lee et al.,[35] and Kim et al.[36] demonstrated weak measurement and the reversing measurement can protect a single-qubit state and two-qubit entanglement state from decohering the amplitude damping (AD). In Refs. [37] and [38], it was demonstrated that the weak measurement method can increase the fidelities of a three-qubit GHZ state and a W-like state in an AD channel.

In this paper, we first propose a BQT scheme to transmit three-qubit GHZ states based on the work of Ref. [20], then we generalize this scheme to teleport multi-qubit GHZ states. As an example, we use the AD channel model to analyze the influence of quantum noise on this BQT scheme and give the fidelity of the result of the teleportation. Finally, we use the weak measurement and the reversing measurement on part of the qubits of the teleportation channel state before and after the entanglement distribution. The comparison between the results shows the weak measurement method is helpful for enhancing the fidelity of the bidirectional teleportation in an AD channel.

2. Bidirectional multi-qubit quantum teleportation in ideal environment
2.1. Bidirectional quantum teleportation of three-qubit GHZ states

In this section, we first discuss the bidirectional teleportation scheme to transport three-qubit GHZ states in a noiseless quantum channel. Suppose that Alice and Bob have the following three-qubit GHZ states to be teleported, respectively, which are described as

where α0, α1, β0, and β1 are the arbitrary complex numbers that satisfy , , respectively. The bidirectional teleportation procedure is composed of the following five steps.

Step 1 An eight-qubit composite GHZ state should be shared by Alice and Bob as the teleportation channel, which is generated as follows:

Here, qubits , , , and are held by Alice, and qubits , , , and are held by Bob. The total state of , and can be described as

Step 2 Alice performs a controlled-NOT (CNOT) operation on qubits and , and Bob performs a CNOT operation on qubits and , where and are control qubits and and are target qubits. Then, the state in Eq. (4) is changed into the following form:

Step 3 Alice and Bob perform a single-qubit -basis measurement on qubits and respectively, and they perform a single-qubit -basis measurement on qubits and respectively. After these measurements, one of the following sixteen results can be obtained with the same probability:

Alice and Bob announce the measurement results to each other in a classic channel. Suppose that the results are , then the quantum state of the remaining ten qubits will collapse into the following state:

Step 4 Alice and Bob perform a single-qubit -basis measurement on qubits and respectively, then they announce the measurement results. The results may be or . Suppose that the results are , then the quantum state of the remaining eight qubits will collapse into

Step 5 Alice and Bob perform a single-qubit -basis measurement on qubits and respectively, then they announce the measurement results. Suppose that the results are , then the quantum state of the remaining six qubits will collapse into

Equation (8) shows that after the above steps, Alice has reconstructed the initial state on her qubits , and , and Bob has reconstructed the initial state on his qubits , and . The bidirectional quantum teleportation of three-qubit GHZ state is completed successfully. If Alice and Bob obtain other results in Step 5, they can perform the corresponding unitary operations in Table 1 to reconstruct the quantum states and .

Table 1.

Unitary operations of Alice and Bob.

.
2.2. Bidirectional quantum teleportation of multi-qubit GHZ states

The scheme in subSection 2.1 could be extended to teleporting multi-qubit GHZ states. Suppose that Alice and Bob have the following n-qubit GHZ states to be teleported, respectively:

Before the teleportation, Alice and Bob must share a 2N-qubit composite GHZ state described as

In Eq. (11), . Qubit ( ) belongs to Alice and qubit ) belongs to Bob. Using a similar method to that in subSection 2.1, the bidirectional n-qubit GHZ state teleportation can be completed successfully. In this scheme, Alice and Bob each need to perform the CNOT operation once, the single-qubit -basis measurement once, the single-qubit -basis measurements times and the -qubit unitary operation once. The -qubit unitary operation is described as

where ) is an appropriate Pauli gate.

3. Bidirectional quantum teleportation in noisy channel

In this section, we will discuss how the noise in a quantum channel influences the procedure of bidirectional teleportation. As an example, we assume that the channel model is an AD channel. It can model many practical physical processes, such as spontaneous emission and super-conduction with zero-temperature energy relaxation. In this model, the evolutions of a single-qubit system state and the environment can be described as the following quantum transformation:[39]

where subscripts S and E denote the system and the environment respectively, and p is the amplitude damping factor. The Kraus operators of this channel are

We still consider the bidirectional teleportations of three-qubit GHZ states. Assume the noise mainly exists in the process of entanglement distribution in the quantum channel. To reduce the influence of quantum noise as much as possible, Bob should prepare the four-qubit GHZ state and distribute qubit to Alice. Similarly, Alice prepares the four-qubit GHZ state and distribute qubit to Bob. During the distribution, only qubits and undergo amplitude damping, the eight-qubit channel state in Eq. (3) evolves into the following form:

After the bidirectional teleportation described in Subsection 2.1, Alice can reconstruct the quantum state on her qubits , and , and Bob can reconstruct the quantum state on his qubits , and , which can be expressed as

where and are the normalization factors. Performing a partial trace over the environment in Eq. (16), we can obtain the following reduced density matrix of :
where is described as

4. Bidirectional quantum teleportation aided with weak measurement and the reversing measurement

According to Ref. [35], the weak measurement and the corresponding reversing measurement on a single-qubit system can be described as the following transformations:

where and are the strengths of the weak measurement and the reversing measurement, respectively; denotes the weak measurement environment; denotes the reversing measurement environment.

During the entanglement distribution, only qubit of the four-qubit GHZ state suffers amplitude damping, so Bob only needs to perform the weak measurement on qubit before it is distributed, then is changed into the following form:

After the weak measurement, qubit is distributed in the amplitude damping channel, then the quantum state in Eq. (21) evolves into

where is the normalization factor.

After the processes above, Alice receives qubit and she performs the reversing measurement, then the quantum state in Eq. (22) is changed into

where is the normalization factor.

With a similar derivation, the four-qubit GHZ state will be changed into the following state:

Then, the eight-qubit teleportation channel state in Eq. (3) is changed into the following form:

Using the shared channel state in Eq. (25), Alice and Bob perform the bidirectional teleportation described in Subsection 2.1, then Alice can reconstruct the quantum state on her qubits , , and , which has the following form:

where is the normalization factor. Similarly, Bob can reconstruct the quantum state on his qubits , and , which has the following form:

Performing a partial trace over the environment in Eq. (26), we can obtain the reduced density matrix of as follows:

where

5. Analysis and discussion
5.1. Fidelity of the bidirectional teleportation in AD channel

The fidelity is an important metric to display the distance between quantum states. The fidelity between states and is defined as

If state is a pure quantum state, then the fidelity between and an arbitrary quantum state ρ can be calculated as

In an AD channel, if Alice and Bob teleport the three-qubit GHZ states and by using the scheme in Subsection 2.1, then Alice can obtain a three-qubit quantum state with the density matrix . According to Eqs. (2), (18), and (31), we can calculate the fidelity between and , which can be expressed as

The fidelity varying with amplitude damping factor p is shown in Fig. 1 with three different states denoted as , and .

Fig. 1. (color online) Fidelity of the bidirectional teleportation in AD channel.

In Fig. 1, we choose

It can be seen from this figure that decreases with the increase of p. The quality of the teleportation deteriorates when the amplitude damping turns serious.

5.2. Fidelity of the bidirectional teleportation in AD channel aided with weak measurement

According to Section 4, if Alice and Bob each perform a weak measurement before the entanglement distribution of qubits and , and perform a corresponding reversing measurement after the entanglement distribution, then Alice will obtain the teleportation result . From Eqs. (2), (28), and (31), we can calculate the fidelity between and as

The comparison between and is given in Fig. 2. Here, we use the optimal reversing condition: , and . From Fig. 2 we can see that and both decrease with the increase of p. For each , , and and a certain p, is always bigger than , showing the method aided with weak measurement and the reversing measurement can increase the fidelity of the bidirectional teleportation in the AD channel effectively.

Fig. 2. (color online) Comparison between the BQT fidelities with and without weak measurement.

The fidelities and varying with p and are shown in Fig. 3. Here, we choose . It can be seen from this figure that for a certain p, is always bigger than , and increases with weak measurement strength increasing.

Fig. 3. (color online) 3D comparison between the BQT fidelities with and without weak measurement.

From Eqs. (1), (17), (27), and (31), we can also obtain a similar result that the weak measurement and the reversing measurement can increase the teleportation fidelity of in the AD channel. Because of the limitation of length, the details of the derivation process are omitted here.

5.3. Success probability of the weak measurement and the reversing measurement

According to subSection 5.2, we can increase the teleportation fidelity by choosing a larger weak measurement strength . But this is not always the best choice. Based on the procedures described in Section 4, the total success probability of the weak measurement and the reversing measurement on qubits and can be calculated from the following form:

The success probability varying with p and is shown in Fig. 4. It can be seen that decreases with p and increasing. This means if we want to obtain a higher fidelity by choosing a larger , then we will acquire a smaller successful probability. Consequently, how to choose an appropriate needs to be balanced carefully.

Fig. 4. (color online) Total success probability of the weak measurement and the reversing measurement.
6. Conclusions

In this work, we present a BQT scheme to transmit three-qubit and multi-qubit GHZ states. This scheme mainly utilizes CNOT operation and single-qubit measurement, thus it has a higher practicability. Unlike previous research that usually discuss BQT in an ideal quantum channel, we intended to study the influence of quantum noise on BQT. As an example, we analyze our BQT scheme in an amplitude damping channel and obtain the fidelity of the teleportation, which decreases with the amplitude damping factor increasing. In order to suppress this influence, we use the weak measurement and the reversing measurement before and after the quantum entanglement distribution, demonstrating an effective enhancement of the teleportation fidelity. On the other hand, we find that a higher fidelity needs a stronger weak measurement strength, which leads to a smaller success probability. This is a contradiction we must consider, and the solution is expected to be found in future work.

Reference
[1] Bennett C H Brassard G Crépeau C Jozsa R Peres A Wootters W K 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1895
[2] Deng F G Li C Y Li Y S Zhou H Y Wang Y 2005 Phys. Rev. 72 022338
[3] Li X H Deng F G Zhou H Y 2007 Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 1151
[4] Zhou P Li X H Deng F G Zhou H Y 2007 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 13121
[5] Man Z X Xia Y J An N B 2007 Phys. Rev. 75 052306
[6] Yan F L Ding H W 2006 Chin. Phys. Lett. 23 17
[7] Pati A K Agrawal P 2007 Phys. Lett. 371 185
[8] Chen X B Du J Z Wen Q Y Zhu F C 2008 Chin. Phys. 17 771
[9] Yan F L Yan T 2010 Chin. Sci. Bull. 55 902
[10] Huelga S F Vaccaro J A Chefles A Plenio M B 2001 Phys. Rev. 63 042303
[11] Huelga S F Plenio M B Vaccaro J A 2002 Phys. Rev. 65 042316
[12] Zha X W Zou Z C Qi J X Song H Y 2013 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52 1740
[13] Li Y H Nie L P 2013 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52 1630
[14] An Y 2013 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52 3870
[15] Chen Y 2014 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53 1454
[16] Sang M H 2016 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55 1333
[17] Li Y H 2016 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55 3008
[18] Yang Y Q Zha X W Yu Y 2016 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55 4197
[19] Binayak S C Arpan D 2016 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55 2275
[20] Hassanpour S Houshmand M 2016 Quantum Inform. Process. 15 905
[21] Pan J W Simon C Brukner Č Zeilinger A 2001 Nature 410 1067
[22] Ren B C Du F F Deng F G 2014 Phys. Rev. 90 052309
[23] Yang G Lian B W Nie M 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 010303 in Chinese
[24] Shor P W 1995 Phys. Rev. 52 2493
[25] Wang Y J Bai B M Li Z Peng J Y Xiao H L 2012 Chin. Phys. 21 020304
[26] Terhal B M 2015 Rev. Mod. Phys. 87 307
[27] Li C K Nakahara M Poon Y T Sze N S Tomita 2011 Phys. Rev. 84 044301
[28] Xu G F Zhang J Tong D M Sjöqvist E Kwek L C 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 170501
[29] Liu A P Cheng L Y Chen L Su S L Wang H F Zhang S 2014 Opt. Commun. 313 180
[30] Korotkov A N Jordan A N 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 166805
[31] Katz N Neeley M Ansmann M Bialczak R C Hofheinz M Lucero E Connell A O Wang H Cleland A N Martinis J M Korotkov A N 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 200401
[32] Sun Q Al-Amri M Zubairy M S 2009 Phys. Rev. 80 033838
[33] Liao Z Al-Amri M Zubairy M S 2013 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 46 145501
[34] Korotkov A N Keane K 2010 Phys. Rev. 81 040103
[35] Lee J C Jeong Y C Kim Y S Kim Y H 2011 Opt. Express 19 16309
[36] Kim Y S Lee J C Kwon O Kim Y H 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 117
[37] Liao X P Fang M F Fang J S Zhu Q Q 2014 Chin. Phys. 23 020304
[38] Yang G Lian B W Nie M 2016 Chin. Phys. 25 080310
[39] Nielsen M A Chuang I L 2000 Quantum Computation and Quantum Information Cambridge Cambridge University Press